Make Palestine the issue on Thursday!

Cheltenham, as most will know, is a two-horse race between the Conservative candidate and the Liberal Democrat incumbent. Here’s a very brief summary of where each stands on Israel/Palestine…

Mark Coote

Visited Israel courtesy of the inluential lobby group Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) back in 2007. Subsequently accepted a donation of £2000 from the Lewis Trust Group, one of the key backers of CFI. In conversation with GPSC in December 2009, seemed very willing to listen, but gave very little away regarding his own position; until the end of the evening that is, when – in answer to the question of what he considered was the first step to peace – he said that “Hamas needed to lay down arms and recognise Israel”. Lest folk forget, this was post Israel’s murderous assault on Hamas-run Gaza in 2008/9, an assault described by renowned international jurist Richard Goldstone as a “deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and terrorise a civilian population”.

Martin Horwood

Has consistently taken GPSC’s concerns to the relevant Foreign Office officials, and – in conversation with GPSC in January 2010 – confirmed he advocated a solution rooted in international law. Also seemed aware of the importance of both addressing and ultimately resolving the key issue, that of the refugees driven from their homes in 1948 and ever since denied the right of return, in contravention of international law. Horwood has also endorsed an official Liberal Democrat pledge on Palestine which, though it doesn’t go far enough, represents a welcome departure from the status quo positions adopted by both the Conservatives and Labour. The pledge can be found at:


2 thoughts on “Make Palestine the issue on Thursday!”

  1. This doesn’t appear to be a particularly balanced piece. As an existing MP Horwood would clearly have greater scope to act than a PPC irrespective of his particular leanings.
    Moreover, the “lest folk forget” tone of the first comment lends little credibility to the idea that the writer may be impartial.
    But then, perhaps it was never the author’s intention to appear impartial.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s